Method of assessment:
Active participation in lectures and seminars and the completion of given tasks and exam/essay/other assignment given at the beginning of the course.
The assessment criteria is based on the learning outcomes of the course.
Criteria for assessment of the assignment:
0 = it is unfinished, fragmentary; the text is not connected to the theme of the course, only few references.
1 = it is very superficial, disconnected matters are presented, and references are weakly used.
2 = it is superficial, matters are disconnected in some places, references are satisfactorily used.
3 = it contains reflection on the theme, matters are connected to each other, there is a plot in the work, using references is at a good level.
4 = it is presented and written in an analytical way, matters are well connected to each other, using references is mainly at a very good level.
5 = it is presented and written in a systematic and analytical way, matters are connected to each other very well, the using of references is excellent.